 |
|
 |
| Vol. 2009-01 | January, 2009 |
CONSTRUCTION DEFECTS AND BUILDING PRODUCTS
|
Construction defects claims arise in all venues of the construction industry, and may be attributable, whether directly or
indirectly, to building products defects and failures.
Defect claims involving construction typically involve a design mistake or deficiency in the planning, design, construction documents, contract documents, administration ("supervision"), inspection, or implementation of any improvement to real property. Construction defect claims may be attributable to any one or more related aspects of the complex building process, namely:
Initially, construction defect liability may be based on the decisions of the architect-engineer or builder and/or developer, since they are (each) in a primary position to decide budgets, applicable building codes, construction strategy, procedures, limitations, and implementation. The A/E must stress the need for testing and analysis of soil and sub-surfaces, and to design based upon soil stability and support, in order to prepare adequately before placing foundations. This is only a limited example of the several important preliminary evaluations required. Next, where soil and subsurface conditions are poor, or unacceptable, the responsibility of the A/E designer and builder- developer shift to a duty to choose the best construction strategy to preclude building failure and construction defects, injuries or deaths. At the first sign of a construction defect or failure, fully |
document all factual issues with photographs, videotape,
written memoranda and full communication of all observations and reports to the highest authority in charge of each project.
Construction defects in any building project may be attributable to a complex variety of causes. Determining whether a
cause is the proximate cause, and the actual construction defect is a critical challenge. However, once determined
that a construction defect exists, it is essential to develop a strategy to determine who is responsible for the defect,
and who shall bear the cost to cure or repair?
The causes of construction defects and construction deficiencies (poor quality or substandard workmanship) and subsurface/geotechnical problems are extremely difficult to detect and often even more difficult to repair or cure. The priority is to restore the building to full occupancy in a safe and economically productive condition. This can be an arduous task unless Counsel is familiar with all aspects of the construction process, from land development to occupancy, and all that goes with it. The entire chain of participants in any construction project, from Developers to Owners, Investors, Architects, Engineers, Contractors, Subcontractors, and even to Suppliers and to Manufacturers of Building Products, without the technical training, experience and knowledge of the construction-legal process are at a distinct disadvantage, and should seek experienced Construction Counsel as an advocate, to provide informed guidance, representation, and risk reduction. "Judge a man by his questions rather than by his answers." Voltaire AUTHOR / EDITOR: J. NORMAN STARK is an Attorney-at-Law, a Registered Architect, (AIA, NCARB) Registered Landscape Architect, Interior Designer, Planner and Senior Appraiser (ASA), admitted to practice law before the Bar of Ohio, the US District Courts, Ohio and Illinois (Central Dist.), the US Court of Appeals, and the United States Supreme Court. He is a Mediator, Arbitrator and Litigator with experience in Business, Construction, and Public Works, and with additional experience in Real Estate, Construction-Legal Project and Crisis Management, and as an Expert Witness. His office is in Cleveland, Ohio. |