|
 |
Construction Lawletter
For Industry Professionals, Managers, Trades & Suppliers
J. NORMAN STARK, ATTORNEY and REGISTERED ARCHITECT
JURIS DOCTOR, B. ARCHITECTURE, B.F.A.
17000 St. Clair Avenue . Cleveland, Ohio 44110-2535
Tel.: (216) 531-5310 . Fax: (888) 833-5860 . E-Mail: www.Normstark@aol.com
In Florida . 6500 Midnight Pass Rd. #105 . Sarasota, FL 34242 . (941) 349-2061.
|
|
|
 |
| Vol. 2006-08-d |
August, 2006 |
Employment; At-Will (In response to numerous inquiries. Editor)
Employment by written agreement or contract, for a specific period of time of not less than one year, with specific
terms, is strictly contractual and will be construed according to the agreement between the parties. At-will employment
is, however, as the name implies, at the will (or whim) of the employer.
The Supreme Court of Ohio held:
{¶ 17} At-will employment is contractual in nature. Floyd v. DuBois
Soap Co. (1942), 139 Ohio St. 520, 530-531, 23 O.O. 20, 41 N.E.2d 393. In such a relationship, the employee agrees to
perform work under the direction and control of the employer, and the employer agrees to pay the employee at an agreed
rate. Moreover, either an employer or an employee in a pure at-will employment relationship may legally terminate the
employment relationship at any time and for any reason. Mers v. Dispatch Printing Co. (1985), 19 Ohio St.3d 100, 103, 19
OBR 261, 483 N.E.2d 150. In the event that an at-will employee quits or is fired, he or she provides no further services
for the employer and is generally entitled only to wages and benefits already earned.
{¶ 18} It follows that either an employer or an employee in an at-will relationship may propose to
change the terms of their employment relationship at any time.
|
|
If, for instance, an employer notifies an employee that
the employee's compensation will be reduced, the employee's remedy, if dissatisfied, is to quit. Similarly, if the
employee proposes to the employer that he deserves a raise and will no longer work at his current rate, the employer
may either negotiate an increase or accept the loss of his employee. In either event the employee is entitled to be
paid only for services already rendered pursuant to terms to which they both have agreed. Thus, mutual promises to
employ and to be employed on an ongoing at-will basis, according to agreed terms, are supported by consideration: the
promise of one serves as consideration for the promise of the other.
Lake Land Emp. Group of Akron, LLC v. Columber, 101 Ohio St.3d 242, 2004-Ohio-786.
AUTHOR / EDITOR: J. NORMAN STARK is an Attorney-at-Law, a Registered Architect, (AIA, NCARB) Registered
Landscape Architect, Interior Designer, Planner and Senior Appraiser (ASA), admitted to practice law before the Bar of
Ohio, the US District Courts, Ohio and Illinois (Central Dist.), the US Court of Appeals, and the United States Supreme
Court. He is a Mediator, Arbitrator and Litigator with experience in Business, Construction, and Public Works, and with
additional experience in Real Estate, Construction-Legal Project and Crisis Management, and as an Expert Witness. His
office is in Cleveland, Ohio.
|
|
|